
Assessing Technology in Instructional Practice
It can be said that educational technology is only as good as the teachers that use it. Computer skills are not the only, and perhaps not even the most important, prerequisite for effective technology integration. The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) has established National Educational Technology Standards for students, teachers, and administrators. All educators should be familiar with these standards (see the Curriculum and Learning section of Shen's web site for related standards and resources).
The rubric below helps teachers see themselves in relationship with the stages of technology integration. No score is good or bad. Teachers should take this self-assessment, set goals accordingly and retake the assessment at least once per year. School leaders who advocate use of this tool will help all teachers begin to see the larger picture of technology in instructional practices.
Directions
In each column, circle the number associated with the
phrase that best describes your level of technology integration. Add
the circled numbers together and aim to improve your score each year. The phrase
below the number you circled can be viewed as your goal, your next
step in the process to further integrate technology in your instructional
practices. [Printable PDF version]
|
Integration |
Use |
Teacher |
|
|
|
Stage 1 |
Never uses technology with students |
Does not plan technology use to support curriculum or classroom management |
Does not perceive technology as an important part of instruction |
Technology use is not teacher directed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 2 |
Occasional use of technology with students |
Struggles to plan meaningful technology use |
Perceives technology as a skill set that students must learn |
Minimal teacher involvement; relies primarily on pre-packaged material, assistance from colleagues, or material not developed by the teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 3 |
Regular use of technology with students |
Plans technology with skill acquisition as primary goal |
Understands technology is a tool for teaching and learning |
Participates in instruction of technology related lessons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 4 |
Requires and directs independent use of technology by students |
Plans technology curriculum integration that uses lower level thinking skills |
Understands how technology impacts instructional design |
Creates and directs curriculum projects using technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 5 |
Routinely integrates curriculum with technology in classroom and/or lab |
Plans technology curriculum integration that uses higher level thinking skills |
Understands and mentors others in technology and curriculum integration |
Creates and directs curriculum related projects with technology that require higher level thinking skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 6 |
Designs and implements assignments that introduce unique environments and situations utilizing technology. |
New instructional patterns emerge from the use of technology. |
Perceives and understands how educational technology drives exploration of new curriculum integration models |
Teacher goes beyond existing instructional models for technology integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All information related to this rubric was created, selected or modified by Ilka Morse, Gail Pietrafesa, or Pam Rorick.
Total Score _____________
Simply add the circled numbers together. An obvious goal is to
improve this score each year.
*Based on the
ACOT Integration stages
and the Mountain Brook Schools
model.
Ideas also incorporated from
LoTi (Levels of Technology Integration) model by Christopher
Moersch.
This page is maintained in accordance
with Shenendehowa's web publishing guidelines by
Ilka Morse,
Gail Pietrafesa, and
Pam Rorick.