Formal Research Paper Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
Research Paper Format |
*Clear understanding of research paper format *Paper is at least two full pages in length with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion |
*Somewhat clear understanding of research paper format *Paper is one to two pages in length with a somewhat strong introduction, body, and conclusion |
*Weak or no understanding of research paper format *Paper is one page or less in length with a weak or missing introduction, body, and conclusion |
|
Research Paper Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat complete bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of research paper *Clear presentation of research paper *Paper is discussed and not read word for word |
*Somewhat clear introduction of research paper *Somewhat clear presentation of research paper *Paper is somewhat discussed with some reading word for word |
*Unclear or no introduction of research paper *Unclear presentation of research paper *Paper is read word for word |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
15
PowerPoint Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
PowerPoint Format |
*Product consists of at least six slides *Text items are easy to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors enhance the content |
*Product consists of at least four slides *Text items are fairly easy to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors somewhat enhance the content |
*Product consists of three slides or less *Text items are difficult to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors are limited in enhancing the content |
|
PowerPoint Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat complete bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of PowerPoint *Clear presentation of PowerPoint |
*Somewhat clear introduction of PowerPoint *Somewhat clear presentation of PowerPoint |
*Unclear or no introduction of PowerPoint *Unclear presentation of PowerPoint |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
15
Website Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
Website Format |
*Website is easy to navigate *Text items are easy to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors enhance the content *All external links to connecting websites connect |
*Website is fairly easy to navigate *Text items are fairly easy to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors somewhat enhance the content *Most external links to connecting websites connect |
*Website is difficult to navigate *Text items are difficult to read *Photographs, graphics, sound and/or video, background, and colors are limited in enhancing the content *Few, if any, external links to connecting websites connect |
|
Website Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat clear bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of website *Clear presentation of website |
*Somewhat clear introduction of website *Somewhat clear presentation of website |
*Unclear or no introduction of website *Unclear presentation of website |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
15
Letter Writing Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
Letter Format |
*Clear understanding of friendly letter writing format *Three one page friendly letters are included *Clear audience (relative or friend) *Tone of letters reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Somewhat clear understanding of friendly letter writing format *Two one page friendly letters are included *Somewhat clear audience *Tone of letters somewhat reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Weak or no understanding of friendly letter writing format *A one page or less friendly letter is included *Confusing audience *Tone of letters does not reflect that of the Civil War era |
|
Letter Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat complete bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of letters *Clear presentation of letters *Letters are presented with feeling |
*Somewhat clear introduction of letters *Somewhat clear presentation of letters *Letters are read with some feeling |
*Unclear or no introduction of letters *Unclear presentation of letters *Letters are not presented with feeling (monotone) |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
15
Diary Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
Diary Format |
*Clear understanding of dated diary format *Diary is three pages in length with at least three or more dated entries *Tone of diary reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Somewhat clear understanding of dated diary format *Diary is two pages in length with at least two dated entries *Tone of diary somewhat reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Weak or no understanding of dated diary format *Diary is one page or less in length with one or no dated entry *Tone of diary does not reflect that of the Civil War time era |
|
Diary Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat complete bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of diary *Clear presentation of diary *Diary is read with feeling |
*Somewhat clear introduction of diary *Somewhat clear presentation of diary *Diary is read with some feeling |
*Unclear or no introduction diary *Unclear presentation of diary *Diary is not performed with feeling (monotone) |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
15
Character Role Play Rubric
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Written Presentation of the Whole Project |
*Neat and aesthetic (Professional) *Organization is logical |
*Neat and fairly aesthetic (Somewhat professional) *Organization is fairly logical |
*Untidy and unaesthetic (Not professional) *Organization lacks clear logic |
|
Spelling, Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics |
*Few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary always appropriate and meaning clear |
*Minor errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Vocabulary usually appropriate and meaning clear |
*Many errors in basic spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics *Meaning not always clear |
|
Role Play Format |
*Clear understanding of role play format *Role play script is two pages in length *Tone of role play reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Somewhat clear understanding of role play format *Role play script is one to two pages in length *Tone of role play somewhat reflects that of the Civil War era |
*Weak or no understanding of role play format *Role play script is less than one page in length *Tone of role play does not reflect that of the Civil War time era |
|
Role Play Content |
*Demonstrates a clear understanding of required research information (all research questions are answered), including a complete bibliography |
*Demonstrates a somewhat clear understanding of required research information (some research questions are answered), including a somewhat complete bibliography |
*Weak or no understanding of required research information (few to no research questions are answered), including an incomplete or no bibliography |
|
Presentation of Project |
*Clear introduction of role play *Clear presentation of role play (in person or on video) *Lines are performed with feeling |
*Somewhat clear introduction of role play *Somewhat clear presentation of role play (in person or on video) *Lines are performed with some feeling |
*Unclear or no introduction of role play *Unclear presentation of role play (in person or on video) *Lines are not performed with feeling (monotone) |
Notes and Comments: Score: __________
Research Project Rubric
Social Studies
|
Exceptional |
Acceptable |
Not Yet |
|
|
Historical Accuracy |
The final product presents information that is historically accurate and relevant. |
The final product presents information that is mostly historically accurate and relevant. |
The final product presents information that is mostly inaccurate and/or irrelevant. |
|
Completeness of Research |
The final product presents a rich, complete understanding of the chosen topic. |
The final product presents a good understanding of the topic. It could be more complete. |
The final product presents only some parts of the topic. Understanding may not be demonstrated. |
|
Explanation of the role of women |
The final product accurately and clearly presents the roles of women both before and after the Civil War. |
The final product presents the roles of women both before and after the Civil War. Parts may be inaccurate or unclear. |
The final product does not clearly or accurately present the roles of women before and after the Civil War. |
|
Final Product |
The final product is neat and aesthetic (professional). Its organization is logical |
The final product is neat and fairly aesthetic (somewhat professional). Its organization is fairly logical |
The final product is untidy and unaesthetic (not professional). Its organization lacks clear logic |
|
Presentation of Project |
There is a clear introduction of research topic and presentation of the material. |
There is a somewhat clear introduction of research topic and presentation of the material. |
There is an uclear introduction of research topic and presentation of the material. |
Notes and Comments: Score: ______________
This page is maintained in accordance with Shenendehowa's web
publishing guidelines by Steve
Anthes.